Resources

These impacts are the result of three channels: direct impacts from the employment and production within the oil and natural gas industry; indirect impacts through the industry’s purchases of intermediate and capital goods from a variety of other US industries; and induced impacts from the personal purchases of employees and business owners both within the oil and natural gas industry and its supply chain, as well as from the personal spending by shareholders out of the dividends received from oil and natural gas companies.

This event brought together a collective of bipartisan congressional leaders who traveled alongside environmental, government, and industry leaders from around the world to the COP28 climate summit. Speakers reflected on what was accomplished, how the U.S. and other global leaders will respond to the agreement, and the next steps toward a clean energy economy.

We write in response to recent reports that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is considering updating the criteria it uses to determine whether an application for exporting liquified natural gas (LNG) is in the public interest.

In this video, Sasha Mackler (Executive Director, The Energy Program, Bipartisan Policy Center) shares the enormous climate and environmental benefits LNG can provide internationally.

Paul Bledsoe (Professorial Lecturer, American university Center for Environmental Policy) explains why methane reduction paired with global coal-to-gas switching will be key to powering a cleaner future.

Hear about the need for global leaders to identify pragmatic solutions that will protect energy security and reduce emissions.

As a longtime attendee of COP events, Alex Herrgott (President and CEO, The Permitting Institute) has seen consensus about the need to move from coal consumption toward a net-zero climate future. At this year’s COP28, he’s emphasizing the need for a united front to build infrastructure at a faster pace without harming the environment.

A report by Paul Bledsoe of the Progressive Policy Institute finds that expanding U.S. natural gas production and exports can cut coal use, lowering greenhouse gas emissions.

By unleashing U.S. LNG, we can help solve the dual crises of energy security and climate change.

A recent poll shows that most Americans believe natural gas production is better for the environment than coal and favor building more infrastructure to support production.

Energy companies, climate advocates and labor groups launch coalition to expand natural gas production to replace foreign coal and lower emissions.

Recent polling found that voters support building new pipelines to facilitate increased production and see natural gas as a part of the state’s transition to cleaner energy, while keeping it affordable and reliable.

PAGE Advisory Council member and Strategic Advisor at the Progressive Policy Institute, Paul Bledsoe, writes in The Hill about improving global energy security and reducing emissions by increasing the production and export of natural gas.

Recent polling found that voters support building new pipelines to facilitate increased production and see natural gas as a part of the state’s transition to cleaner energy, while keeping it affordable and reliable.

Recent polling found that voters support building new pipelines to facilitate increased production and see natural gas as a part of the state’s transition to cleaner energy, while keeping it affordable and reliable.

Recent polling found that voters support building new pipelines to facilitate increased production and see natural gas as a part of the state’s transition to cleaner energy, while keeping it affordable and reliable.

Recent polling found that voters support building new pipelines to facilitate increased production and see natural gas as a part of the state’s transition to cleaner energy, while keeping it affordable and reliable.